This is the story of an ordinary bloke trying to get by is a world where affordable housing is just a pipe dream and where financial slavery is here to stay. He did not like this and looked for ways to avoid becoming enslaved - and for that the officers and councillors at Wealden set about ruining the upstart who might upset their applecart.
When you are reading this, imagine that the child in the pictures above is your son or daughter and that your local authority are the ones treating your family this badly. It is only when you put yourself in a victim's shoes that you really begin to appreciate the wrongs that councils still get up to. This is a true story.
Wealden District Council reigned hell on the protagonist in this story, spending well over £550,000 pounds of tax payers money to part their adversary from a building that they knew was of archaeological value, but were intent on denying, with the intention that a neighbour or their company, would purchase it at fraction of the true value if the historic find could be kept concealed for long enough for them to complete the dirty deed. They might then share out the spoils and later reveal the archaeology when it was safe to do so and the illegal procurement was outside any time limits for challenge.
Twenty years into the fray and the victim of these Article 3 violations (mental torture) finally uncovered incontrovertible proof as to the origins of the historic find, proving his council to be liars. That would not do.
Not content to apologise for their Gestapo treatment and be able to shake hands, Wealden then embarked on more character assassination in a stitch up for a crime he did not commit. For this Wealden invoked the services of Sussex police, who had been so helpful in 1997, in deflecting an investigation into council officer corruption.
If you thought that Britain was safe from Gestapo like civil servants, think again. This is a true story backed up by verifiable facts.
The point here, and this is an important constitutional matter, is that where there is no right of appeal and the institutions that are supposed to correct injustice are actually part of the problem, the buck stops with either the King or Queen of England. The Criminal Cases Review Commission appears to have been corrupted and is in no way Human Rights compliant. If you are not HR compliant, you bring Nazi ideals to the table where such mindset was supposed to have been eradicated from civilized states such as those in Europe.
WHO WE WERE FIGHTING AGAINST FROM 1939 TO 1945
UNITED NATIONS - UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
WEALDEN'S OFFICERS FROM 1983 TO 2018
Non conformists are targets for local officials - they crucified him!
A BIT OF HISTORY
The English tend to treat people with strange names differently. Britain is also riddled with corruption, with local parish councils controlling development for profits by favoured developers.
It was then unfortunate that Nelson Kruschandl came to England from South Africa when he was just a toddler. He would have had a better life for sure in Africa, or anywhere for that matter, but not in England, and not in Sussex where the police work for the councils, and civil servants are not only a devious bunch, but many of them have their hands in the till, with masonic connections you could not possibly guess at - and Human Rights violations that would make your hair stand on end. Enter Tyrian Lodge in South Street, Eastbourne. Just 100 yards from the police station in Grove Road.
We fought two World Wars to bring an end to tyranny, discrimination and eugenics programmes that ended with the industrial scale gassing of Jewish and Polish men, women and children at Auschwitz, Buchenwald, Belsen and other concentration camps.
You would imagine then that Britain as the head of the Commonwealth, would be extra vigilant to be sure that all statute enacted after the Human Rights Act 1998, would be compatible with Articles 6 and 14. You'd be wrong. In Her Majesty's United Kingdom it appears you get honours for rigging the system in the form of David Blunkett introducing the Sexual Offences Act 2003, an Act that reverses the assumption on innocence, where anyone accused of a sex crime is presumed to be guilty on entering a Court for trial. For introducing this Act David became Lord Blunkett. Wow! Whereas, we assert that for this Nazi like reversion to the days of Witch Hunts, that he is nothing less that a human rights criminal.
Put that together with legal aid limitations and the level playing field that the United Nations are aiming for with SDG16, is well and truly tilted, virtually guaranteeing a conviction, as well the Criminal Prosecution Service know and use to their advantage. This is a true story backed up by verifiable facts.
SUSSEX POLICE CHIEF CONSTABLES
CCRC OFFICERS 2018
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT - SDG 16 is all about justice and transparency. Tell that to Sussex police and Wealden District Council. If these two local authorities are anything to go by, we might as well have let Adolf Hitler and his chums take over the world. Corruption at any level has to stop.
IN THE UK THE BUCK STOPS HERE: ROYALS FAMILY HEADS OF STATE 2018
Any one of the Royal Family might be in line to look at the matters raised, before taking the case to the United Nations. In theory, before the Royals, the Criminal Cases Review Commission should step in, but they have already fumbled the ball rather badly. This is because their remit allows them to take a view, where taking a view is not Article 14 or Article 17 compliant. In the UK we have no Article 13 in the domestic HRA 1998. We think this means that the only recourse where the CCRC are helping masonic chums, is to petition the Head(s) of State under the provisions of the 1689 Bill of Rights. This right remains to be tested as to its effectiveness. We think that this case may prove to be a precedent.
A TO Z OF ROYAL FAMILY MEMBERS 2018
Nations Commission on Human Rights was established in 1946 to weave
the international legal fabric that protects our fundamental rights and
freedoms. Composed of 53 States members, its brief expanded over time to
allow it to respond to the whole range of human rights problems and it
set standards to govern the conduct of States. It also acted as a forum
where countries large and small, non-governmental groups and human
rights defenders from around the world voiced their concerns.
Between 2003 and 2006 Nelson set traps for Wealden District Council officers who were routinely abusing landowner's rights. One trap in Tilley Lane in Sussex involved blocking in enforcement officers who were coming onto site without proper the written proofs from the authorizing committees (S196 T&CP), making such visits illegal. The point here is that any examination of the written authorisation would be evidence of how committees were being duped at committee level and under delegated powers. Because of this, they never carry anything with them that is incriminating.
As is usual in such cases, dog handlers and the local police were in evidence, oblivious to the fact that the council officers were acting illegally, and that they were patsies (unwilling accomplices) to the fraud. The council officers were challenged and asked for their authority while being filmed. The police were naturally confused and asked what was going on. A laminated extract of Section 196 was shown to the officers, who then realised that they had been lied to by this council. But there are good and bad officers. Good officers would have made mention of this on return to their station. Bad officers would have told them to ignore the incident.
A citizens arrest was threatened against Geoff Johnson and others. A citizens arrest is a lawful procedure where a member of the public who identifies a crime in progress, may apprehend the perpetrators - even with police officers present - and then hand the criminals over to the police, or call the police and explain the crime.
On this occasion Nelson allowed the council officers to leave without arrest on a promise that they would not seek to enter that farm again without the correct paperwork for examination. Those farmers were not bothered again while Nelson was available. But the council realised that they could not continue with their illegal activities while Nelson was on the scene as a dissident challenging their wrongdoing. They had to find a way to discredit him so that other victims of planning related crime would not employ him. In other words, so that councils could continue with their systematic malfeasance in public officer without consequence. Commonly known as selling planning favours - a kind of organised crime that at the moment the police appear to be supporting. Julian Assange is another dissident who is on the official hit list to be discredited. In reality, Europe is just as hard on anyone questioning their systems, as Asia. The only difference is that Asian countries are more honest about their human rights violations.
Nelson was wrongly accused in 2008, taking him out of circulation for about four years and still with his hands tied until 2019, after which, with evidence that was not available to his legal team in 2008, he will be unable to set the record straight conclusively in Her Majesty's United Kingdom - where there is no right of appeal and the Criminal Cases Review Commission are allowed to filter cases in discriminatory fashion. This kind of old boys network that fosters an alternative agenda for the high proportion of masons in the British justice system. Most people laugh when you mention masons, for it conjures up conspiracy theories, but in this case we know that Ian Kay's father in law was a prominent mason and so was Nelson's prospective father in law, before he called off the engagement that would cause so much injustice to rain down on him.
This is a true story backed up by verifiable facts.
ANATOMY OF A STATE STITCH UP - FLOW CHART
Ian Kay was the assistant district planning officer at Wealden District Council from 1983, we know that he was one of the case officers along with J Douglas Moss, Christine Nuttall and Victorio Scarpa.
We hope that in the process of seeking to put outstanding matters to rest, that Nelson will be aiding the acceleration of the medical sciences, so advancing law enforcement, and exposing judicial malpractices.
EUROPEAN COURT HUMAN RIGHTS
His faith in the European Court of Human Rights was shattered when they struck out a valid claim lodged in 2009, in 2012, simply because in 2012 he applied for a Judicial Review in the UK. He says that the ECHR should have kept his case live where they must have known a JR application to flush out yet more corrupt court officials would be refused by those Judges a part of the old boys network. Anything that challenges the sanctity of the English Courts and violations of Article 5 and Article 6 is strongly resisted by a network of senior judges. Usually, those close to retirement. You may notice that many of the battles that Nelson engages in, take years for a result. You may also have noticed that David Cameron wanted to wipe out any independent review of British human rights violations.
MORE SUSSEX POLICE INSTITUTIONALISED DISCRIMINATION
In 2013 Sussex Police raided offices taking other papers, smashing down 5 doors in the process, and finally not charging Nelson after a what is alleged to amount to a false allegation on the part of Donald Wales, seeking to claim that he'd not signed and posted a Trademark Agreement. But a number of papers went missing. The objective of this exercise was to prevent the innovator from resuming action against the council. This was a bogus claim that fortunately, the victim was able to disprove when a document that had been alleged was a forgery was demonstrably signed by the other party, including the Special Delivery envelope that Mr Wales had used to post it being hand written in his own hand, and covering letter also signed by Mr Wales, fortunately with copies kept safe elsewhere. Mr Wales was not prosecuted for wasting Surrey or Sussex police time and may even have been asked to make the complaint by the police. Who knows what any investigation will uncover. Police damaging property like this is all part of terror tactics designed to frighten targets to desist from their lawful civil objectives.
In 2014 Nelson was again subjected to a false allegation. Sussex Police did not investigate the matter fully, having been provided with keys to premises to prevent more criminal damage. In this case video evidence was edited to cut out the parts that proved he'd been set up, and a key witness was not interviewed even though she had been identified in a written statement as needing to be seen. The objective though of Wealden DC was to prevent Nelson resuming his claims against them by securing another criminal conviction - as in 2008 - by any means possible.
The public should know that agencies work together to manipulate vulnerable citizens in this fashion. In this case a jury were not fooled into ignoring the missing evidence, even though the Judge Anthony Scott-Gall directed them to do so. Nelson says that partial faith in the system was restored by this incident, not the legal system, but the sense of fair play of the ordinary man when faced with extraordinary circumstances. It helps to have a barrister who is not part of the ring. Once again, the claimant was not prosecuted for wasting police time.
Should you think that this is just ten years of malicious conduct, you should know that Wealden began persecuting Nelson soon after 1982 when he called them out on a tree preservation matter. By 1998 he had become the subject of a vendetta with over 181 recorded enforcement visits - that were later proven to be based on misinformation (lies). Did the UK not agree to invade Iraq on misinformation under the lead of Tony Blair? No matter how noble the cause, misinformation equals fraud in a society that should be based on honesty and transparency.
Most of the council officers involved in the original stitch up have gone, the present leaders though are suspect if they work to continue such efforts, and not cooperate to set the record straight.
This is a true story backed up by verifiable facts.
This is one of the deciding factors in any defence. How much will a person who is legally aided allowed to defend himself. Will it cover medical experts and forensic examination of computers. The answer is NO. In any case where medical experts are required, or examination of computers, you will be hard pressed to mount any kind of defence. In this case both solicitor Timothy Stirmey and barrister Julian Dale, worked against their client. Refusing to challenge the medical evidence and refusing to call character witnesses, or even take statements.
That left Nelson without any witnesses appearing on his behalf, whereas the state had called a school teacher, a friend of the claimant, the mother of the claimant an a (so-called) medical expert, plus the arresting officer; Gordon Staker. Sussex police failed to call Elizabeth Carter, their nominated forensic expert.
This was Nelson's first time in a Crown Court trial. He had no idea what he was up against........
THIS PAGE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION & WILL BE POPULATED AS WE FIND MORE EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT BRINGING THE MATTER TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HEAD OF STATE IN ENGLAND, AND IF NECESSARY, THENCE TO THE UNITED NATIONS COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.
JUST AN ORDINARY BLOKE - [Left and centre] His first motorcycle at Seaford Head in Sussex and as a practical mechanic completing an engine rebuild on a Renault car.
[Right] Genius at play - on target for justice before the United Nations once his domestic remedies are finally put to bed - there are of course no domestic remedies under Article 13 in Great Britain - a nation founded on slave labour and stealing the natural resources of other countries during the period known as the British Empire. Please note that these photographs of the victim in this case are Copyright © Max Energy Limited and Horse Sanctuary Trust. All rights reserved.
"You have enemies? Good. That means you’ve stood up for something, sometime in your life."
This website is copyright © 1991- 2020 Electrick Publications and Horse Sanctuary UK. Max Energy Limited is an educational charity working hard to promote world peace and push for a world free of discrimination and injustice.